What Is Post-Quantum Cryptography and Why Does It Matter?
- Art of Computing

- 1 hour ago
- 3 min read
Post-quantum cryptography is a new class of algorithms designed to withstand attacks from future quantum computers. Today’s public-key methods such as RSA and elliptic-curve cryptography could be broken by sufficiently powerful quantum machines. That creates a “harvest-now, decrypt-later” risk where attackers store encrypted data today and wait for quantum capability to catch up.
In 2024 the US National Institute of Standards and Technology approved three standards for quantum-safe encryption and signatures: FIPS 203 (ML-KEM, formerly Kyber), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA, formerly Dilithium), and FIPS 205 (SPHINCS+). These mark the first stable building blocks for migration. NIST CSRC+1

How Soon Do Organisations Need to Start Migration?
The planning stage needs to start now. Government guidance already sets timelines for inventory and remediation, and the security community expects multi-year transitions. Agencies and large enterprises are being asked to discover where vulnerable cryptography is used, prioritise critical systems, and adopt quantum-safe approaches as standards and products mature. The White House+2CISA+2
Concise summary for decision-makers
The threat: future quantum computers can break today’s public-key crypto, creating long-term exposure for stored data.
The fix: move to “quantum-safe encryption” using standardised post-quantum algorithms.
The timing: begin discovery and pilots now; expect staged implementation as cloud, browsers, and hardware add support.
How Are Cloud Providers Preparing for the Quantum Era?
Major platforms are rolling out quantum-safe options in stages: hybrid TLS key exchanges, support across zero-trust services, and roadmaps for key management.
Cloudflare has enabled post-quantum key agreement across parts of its network and Zero Trust platform to counter harvest-now, decrypt-later risks. Cloudflare Docs+1
Google has tested and shipped post-quantum key agreements in Chrome, adapting as standards converge on ML-KEM. Early rollouts surfaced compatibility issues, a reminder that real-world migrations need careful testing. Chromium Blog+2BleepingComputer+2
AWS and Microsoft are publishing guidance and programmes to help customers plan transitions across services, identity, and TLS. Amazon Web Services, Inc.+2TECHCOMMUNITY.MICROSOFT.COM+2
What Does a Practical PQC Migration Plan Look Like?
Think in phases. Start with discovery, then pilot hybrid approaches, then cut over to standardised algorithms as vendor support stabilises.
Phase | What to do | Owners | Outputs |
1. Discovery | Inventory where RSA/ECC and long-lived data are used. Map certificate chains, VPNs, apps, backups, archives. | Security, architecture, data teams | System list, data-at-rest risk map, vendor gaps |
2. Pilot | Test hybrid TLS using ML-KEM with fallbacks. Validate performance and compatibility. | Network, SRE, app owners | Pilot results, exception list, rollout plan |
3. Adopt | Update protocols, libraries, HSMs, KMS, PKI. Rotate keys and certificates. | Security engineering, infra | New baselines, key rotation runbook |
4. Monitor | Track standards, firmware, and supply-chain updates. Add PQC to procurement requirements. | Governance, procurement | Policy updates, vendor attestations |
Keep crypto-agility central. Build processes to swap algorithms, rotate keys quickly, and update dependencies without large rebuilds.
How Do We Reduce Risk During the Transition?
Prioritise long-lived secrets and sensitive archives that will still matter in 5 to 15 years.
Use hybrid key exchanges where available so sessions remain secure even if one component is later weakened. Chromium Blog
Require vendors to disclose post-quantum roadmaps and support timelines in contracts.
Add quantum-safe controls to zero-trust access, tunnels, and service-to-service links where platform support exists. Cloudflare Docs
What Are the Common Pitfalls?
Compatibility surprises. Early rollouts have caused issues in some TLS middleboxes and legacy appliances. Pilot before broad enablement. BleepingComputer+1
Underestimating performance and size. Post-quantum keys and handshakes are larger; measure impact on constrained links and devices. Chromium Blog
Forgetting data-at-rest. Encrypted backups and archives may be readable in the future if not reprotected with quantum-safe methods.
Where Should You Begin This Quarter?
Run a cryptography inventory across TLS endpoints, APIs, VPNs, messaging, storage, and backups.
Stand up a pilot for hybrid TLS with ML-KEM on non-critical services.
Update your PKI and key-management roadmap to include FIPS 203, 204, 205 options. NIST CSRC
Add post-quantum requirements to new procurements and vendor assessments.
Publish an internal standard that defines “quantum-safe encryption” for your organisation.




Comments